Readers' Comments

  • That's Advertainment   18 years 25 weeks ago

    Minnesota Public Radio has done [http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/12/14_helmsm_advertainment/ its own feature] about KARE's conversion to advertainment.

  • Giving Up the Ghostwriters   18 years 25 weeks ago

    The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette re-ran [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05347/621668.stm most of the Wall Street Journal article]. And the WSJ has put up samples of [http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-ghost0512-08.html some of the internal company documents] used to develop the reporting.

  • Fake Op/Eds: Think Tanks and Piggy Banks   18 years 25 weeks ago

    Editor and Publisher also has a couple of stories about the Bandow scandal, titled "[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001699832 Bandow, Syndicated Columnist, Admits Taking Money from Abramoff]" and "[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001700011 Cal Thomas and Connie Schultz Weigh in on Bandow Payola Scandal]."

    Thomas, a conservative columnist himself, says what Bandow did was "a big no-no" that "damages the credibility of everybody ... I'm getting tired of this." Other conservative columnists, including [[Armstrong Williams]], have also gotten caught recently in similar payola scandals.

    Schultz, a Pulitzer prize-winning columnist at the Cleveland Plain Dealer, says she is "outraged" and "appalled" that Bandow describes his actions as a "lapse in judgment." She noted that "a lapse suggests a temporary or accidental stumble, while he admits to taking money from Abramoff '12 to 24 times' at $2,000 or so a pop. At that rate, it had become a second income."

    She noted that although the payola scandals have all involved conservative pundits, the scandal hurts columnists of all ideologies. "I don't think most readers, when faced with yet another story about yet another corrupt columnist, distinguish between conservative writers and those who are moderate or liberal," she said. "I wish they did, because the pattern is clear, but I don't think that's what happens. We're all tainted by the stain."

  • The Man Who Sold the War   18 years 26 weeks ago

    As all the info coming to us is mostly in online articles and videos, The White House outsourced propaganda to company's like The Rendon Group. As no-one is able to visit the place of terrorist attacks to make a independent report, faking news is a easy task. Add the fact that Bush & Co. are a fascist group, propagating false propaganda using forged documents like the yellow cake stuff becomes a evil nightmare. James Bamford wrote a couple of articles about the Rendon Group. John Rendon and the U.S. propoganda . I think this goes even further, like the ultimate "1984" scenario, The Infowar Techniques of the Rendon Group: a possible theory : http://crashrecovery.org/rendon/

  • Battle of the Childhood Bulge   18 years 26 weeks ago

    Well I give you guys credit for at least not showing a headless torso of a chubby child the way the popular press does. Bad enough they have to dehumanize adults that way. The tacky way the mainstream media handles this issue is more damaging to these kids that their own bodies. And if society is really serious about looking at all causes of obesity, they better start looking into endocrine disrupters, growth hormones in the food, and the mothers' dieting habits. They should also stop singling out fat kids and broader the issue to child nutrition. And they should find experts versed in the behaviorial sciences who aren't scared to death of fat, because the hysteria they create is counterproductive. Not that I am against banning junk food ads for kids, or any ads for that matter. I am just sick of obesity being the exclusive boogyman when the issue is much more complex.

  • Those Pills'll Kill You   18 years 26 weeks ago

    In my opinion, the Bush Adm. will go to any lengths to prevent the American people from saving money on drugs.

  • Jail Chalabi, DeLay, & the Rest of the Un-American Scoundrels   18 years 26 weeks ago

    I second the motion.

  • Bush Administration Seeks to Cut Back Right-to-Know Laws   18 years 26 weeks ago

    The sooner we get the Bush Administration out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. the better.

  • Rumsfeld Targets Blame at Lincoln Group   18 years 26 weeks ago

    In my opinion, no matter who started the war in Iraq, it was up to the American people and Congress to have had more discussion and done more research before we gave Bush the okay to invade Iraq.

  • Welcome to the New PR Watch Forum!   18 years 26 weeks ago

    Bass,

    decrease the size of your monospace font.

    Tools->options->content->
      --->the advanced tab under fonts and colors
        --->monospace size

    I need to use 14 or less for the text box to render completely in the middle division

  • Bush Administration Seeks to Cut Back Right-to-Know Laws   18 years 26 weeks ago

    Knowing this administration is so deeply entrenched in the pockets
    of polluters and despoilers I'm not the least surprised at this news.
    All the more reason for alertness and action to keep it from happening.

  • Welcome to the New PR Watch Forum!   18 years 27 weeks ago

    Nope, i pulled my firefox 1.5 almost as soon as it was available for download, but that data helps a bit.

    what does the client string say?
    it's the last string under the tab
    help --> About Mozilla Firefox

    mine is

    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

    here's a scaled down screenshot.

    it could also have to do with my default font-size or font-family under options. I'll change mine around a bit.

    ===============

    it's font-size. with my browser the monospace font over several different types had to be 14 or less, but that may vary with different screen resolutions. i'd forgotten what a pain in the ass text-boxes are. I seldom use them.

    the textarea element is set at 70 columns, and the middle division (main-content) is about 650px wide on my screen

  • Trust Us, We're Experts   18 years 27 weeks ago

    I offer the future of American politics in a couple of quotes make of them what you will I know what they mean.

    "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
    Abraham Lincoln

    "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion."
    Josph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister

    http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/activit/marketsoc/index_e.html#12

    Social Marketing is "the application of marketing technologies developed in the commercial sector to the solution of social problems where the bottom line is behaviour change." It involves: "the analysis, planning, execution and evaluation of programs designed to influence the voluntary behaviour of target audiences to improve their personal welfare and that of society."

    http://www.who.int/hia/en/

    HIA provides decision makers with information about how any policy, programme or project may affect the health of people. HIA seeks to influence decision makers to improve the proposal. WHO supports the use of HIA because of its ability to influence policies, programmes and/or projects. This provides a foundation for improved health and wellbeing of people likely to be affected by such proposals

    "Fascism is on the march today in America. Millionaires are marching to the tune. It will come in this country unless a strong defense is set up by all liberal and progressive forces... A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government, and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. Aboard ship a prominent executive of one of America's largest financial corporations told me point blank that if the progressive trend of the Roosevelt administration continued, he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism to America."
    former ambassador to Germany
    William Dodd, 1938

    "The job of the President is to set the agenda and the job of the press is to follow the agenda that the leadership sets."
    Lawrence Grossman - longtime head of PBS and NBC News

    "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
    Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945

    "What happened was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to be governed by surprise, to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security ...
    To live in the process is absolutely not to notice it -- please try to believe me -- unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, regretted.
    Believe me this is true. Each act, each occasion is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join you in resisting somehow.
    Suddenly it all comes down, all at once. You see what you are, what you have done, or, more accurately, what you haven't done (for that was all that was required of most of us: that we did nothing) ... You remember everything now, and your heart breaks. Too late. You are compromised beyond repair. "
    German professor after World War II describing the rise of Nazism to a journalist

    Regards; fxr

  • Bush Threatens to Bomb Media, Blair Gags It   18 years 27 weeks ago

    You seem to be very knowledgeable, I would like your opionion on this article Iraqi Freedom next episode. Goto www.expertnthought.com and tell what you think, thanks a million. http://www.expertnthought.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=2

  • Bush Threatens to Bomb Media, Blair Gags It   18 years 27 weeks ago

    Sounds like you've read David Ray Griffin's books too. They certainly raise a lot of questions that MUST be answered. One thing's for sure-the 9/11 Commission Report was pure hogwash. Maybe the tide is turning and we're getting closer to learning the truth.

  • Shocked (or Not?) at PR and PsyOps in Iraq   18 years 27 weeks ago

    [[Richard Edelman]] has written a [http://www.edelman.com/speak_up/blog/archives/2005/12/pay_for_play_ba.html strongly-written criticism] of the Lincoln Group on his blog: "This is utterly unacceptable behavior. In no way does this describe public relations. It is pay for play and a PR firm based in the US is doing it. ... If a free media is a central aspect of a democratic society, then we cannot allow our PR industry to impede its development. It is a perversion of our business, an intentional blurring of a clear demarcation between paid and earned media."

    Comments posted in response range from agreement with his statement to various defenses of pay for play, on grounds such as "everyone does it," "it's been going on for years," Edelman is engaged in "faux outrage," "we're at war, so ethics are irrelevant," "propaganda in the land of our enemies is a legitimate weapon of war," etc.

  • Shocked (or Not?) at PR and PsyOps in Iraq   18 years 27 weeks ago

    Rozen [http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/003180.html notices the following passage] in a [http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/13295806.htm Knight Ridder story]:

    Under military rules, information operations are restricted to influencing the attitudes and behavior of foreign governments and people. One form of information operations - psychological warfare - can use doctored or false information to deceive or damage the enemy or to bolster support for American efforts.

    Many military officials, however, said they were concerned that the payments to Iraqi journalists and other covert information operations in Iraq had become so extensive that they were corroding the effort to build democracy and undermining U.S. credibility in Iraq. They also worry that information in the Iraqi press that's been planted or paid for by the U.S. military could "blow back" to the American public. ...

    On at least one occasion, psychological warfare specialists have taken a group of international journalists on a tour of Iraq's border with Syria, a route used by Islamic terrorists and arms smugglers, one of the officials said. ...

    The result is a "fuzzing up" of what's supposed to be a strict division between public affairs, which provides factual information about U.S. military operations, and information operations, which can use propaganda and doctored or false information to influence enemy actions, perceptions and behavior....

    Rozen comments: "In plain language: Rumsfeld is using psyops specialists and information warfare specialists on US journalists, and by extension, the American public."

  • On Books   18 years 27 weeks ago

    When I was in the military way back in the 60's I was a Navy SOG which in 1968 became the SEAL's and was a weapons specialist which in simple terms means that I was an American terrorist and assassin.

    So I know quite a bit about how other terrorists would think out and plan out how to get into this nation and do it.

    Right now since bush, cheney, and dumbsfeld are sending U S citizens "over there" there is no need for any terrorist group to spend a ton of money in plans and execution of plans causing transport half way round the world to do my dirty deeds.

    In essense what bush, cheney, and dumbsfeld have done by keeping our folks there in Iraq is to furnish the terrorists our military and other U S citixens as a stay at home do it your self kit to be killed off cheaply in groups or individually, with little loss of their own terrorist folks.

    The root cause of this terrorist-socalled insurgency war is the fact that it was U S and other western private sector corporations that raped the Arab nations of their minerals, and actually caused people like the Shah of Iran, the Iatola Kohmani, and Saddam Hussain to come into power.

    Then to enhance it all it was U S and western nation's lousy foreign policies, and especially the U S's vascillating foreign policies of friend of Iran today enemy tomorrow, friend of Iraq and Saddam and furnish him arms and supplies to wage war against Iran and his own people, the hate Saddam and attack him when he wouldn't kiss ass.

    If you ask me if bush just had to invade a country he should have invaded Saudi Arabia where 15 of the 19 terrorists of 911 were Saudi Citizens. The Saudi's have played bush, daddy bush, and the U S Government like fiddles.

    Ask me again and I would say bush should have invaded Exxon, Mobil, Shell, and all the rest of the western corporations that raped the middle east and caused this whole damned mess starting 75 years ago.

    Ask me a third time and I say bush should have invaded Impirical England and other European nations that held the middle east and Africa hostage to their empires for over 150 years.

    But nah! The bush's daddy and sonny rather than disdaining Impirializm, instead emulate it, proudly..damn them to hell!

    TP
    thomas_pearson46@hotmail.com

  • Swiss Freeze Biotech Rollout   18 years 27 weeks ago

    We, the voters of the U.S. SHOULD be able to do
    the same! However, we are not seeing this
    happening in our "free" country which is, through
    sneaky means being methodically taken over by Big Chema, Big Agri, Big Pharma, Big Techno, and Big Business via Codex Alimentarious--international laws that will errode our health freedoms, making
    our Constitution secondary to international laws
    of Codex. For example the 350,000 emails sent to
    Congress over a two week period did nothing to
    thwart the ammendment which was sneakily added to the
    2006 Agricultural Funding appropriations which
    allows organic foods to be sprayed with
    pesticides and then labeled ORGANIC by the USDA!

  • I LAUGH IN THEIR rEPUBLICAN FACES ABOUT INCOME TAX   18 years 27 weeks ago

    I look at tax(s) a few different ways.

    One, "tax is the price we pay to live in a civilized society."- anonomous IRS agent.

    Two, when the Democrats are in power I usually have three times better imcome, have money to spend, money to pay my tazes, and money to save, so I don't mind the taxes.

    Three, when the republicans are in power, my good paying job disappears one way or another, last two shipped out of country, the price of everything goes ballistic, and I can barely pay my taxes and eat and savings are out of the question.

    I live in Texas where we don't have a state income tax which makes it kinda nice because of, and not including federal income tax, the 54, count em, 54 overt taxing agencies that gobble up the bulk of my money. Compared to these 54 other bloodsuckers federal tax is a breeze. I'm surprised that don't have a gas tax here...I meant a flatulation tax like a penny per fart.

    What I do like about the Democrats is that they will walk right up in your face and tell you they are going to raise your tax and tell you why.

    What I despise about the republicans is that they say no new tax, gimme "my" tax money back, then stab us in our backs with the largest tax raises we ever had...under reagan and g h w bush.

    Now sonny bush whom I met in 1967 while I was home on leave, hasn't raised our taxes (yet) he just borrows the nation in a hole bigger than the grand canyon so he can give it all his buddies in the upper 2% bracket and play war...war he is too gutless to enjoin personally either now or in the past according to his own personal military record and history. I guess sonny bush's pink, or is that yellow flesh, depends on the way the sun hits it I guess, is much to important to put his life or limbs on the line in combat for the good of the country in any war muchless a war he insisted upon.

    Now about why I listen to all the talk shows. Did you ever go for a walk in rattlesnake country? I have and do. So I like to be able to see all the snakes and watch which direction they're going. I sorta call it keeping myself abreast of things so I don't have to guess if my next step should go forward, to the side, or back in order to avoid them. But count on the fact that not one of these talk shows have any influence over the way I think and act.

    I'm not only an independent voter...I'm one independent SOB period.

    TP
    thomas_pearson46@hotmail.com

  • BLOODLESS REVOLT   18 years 27 weeks ago

    Actually what I'm suggesting and am working for is the formation of a third major political party for thinking class citizens that are fed up with being led down the garden path.

    Have you (in this text "you" is stated generically) ever personally chosen a candidate to run for any political office?

    In 99.999% of instances, and unless you are a local, state, or party elite insider the answer to the above queation is no.

    How many times have you either heard or even said to yourself "I'm sick and tired of voting for the lesser of two evils." I know I have hundreds of times.

    One of the most unrecognized or ignored issues in politics is the fact that not even half voter age citizens vote in elections period.

    It is not lack of political interest or apathy that causes this. It is a loss of faith in the Democratic and republican parties to do the right and honest thing.

    Far too many in the Democratic and republican parties have been, are, or will become corrupt. This is documented fact not conjecture, though admittedly there is less corruption among the Democrats than the republicans...for now at least because it depends on which party is currently in power that determines this. And as long as big lobby can wave unlimited monies around even the most honest among us has a number turning us from statemen to bought puppet and the lobbiests will keep upping their monitary offers until "that" number is found.
    This too is a documented fact.

    What I hope to see before I die is a party where candidates are chosen by a process of elimination by individual party member vote at large.

    He or she through process of elimination then becomes the party candidate, responsible to and accountable to, by ironclad written contract to the party members.

    The greatest argument I've received against my proposal is that "it would be so time consuming." I say, so what. Any time consumed getting honest governors and lawmakers compared to the governors and lawmakers in the multilevels of government we have today is gravy time and worth every second spent getting good government.

    If we continue with this two party system of government we have now, where the people we must vote for are chosen for us by rich elite party insiders the problems for this nation will get worse, not better. This is factual documented history.

    It has been clearly documented that politics, entrenched politicians, career bureaucrats, and government contractors have become no more than entities with legal license to steal and get away with it.

    P.J. O'Rourk stated it best in his 1992 book "A Parliment of Whores":

    "Any likeminded group, acting in concert, can steal anything they want and get away with it.

    Apply this sentence with paraphase insertions of the words president-administration, congress, bureaucracy, and government contractor and it clearly states what we see going on in the good ole U S A today.

    Especially, but not exclusively too, government contractors supplying war arms/supplies, today we taxpayers are footing the bills for airplanes, tanks, bombs, etc. etc. ad infinitim. being sold by U S government contractors at prototype costs for production line vehicles and such. And it goes on unabated without the slightest protest from all but a few John Q Citizen's whose voices are no more than whispers lost in the cacaphony of a hurricane.

    With the federal government budget alone and a congress that can't even burp for less than a billion dollars anymore, our interstate highways should be paved with gold from coast to coast, national border to national border. And this too goes on unabated without the slightest protest from all but a few John Q Citizen's whose voices are no more than whispers lost in the cacaphony of another hurricane.

    Many of our larger more populas states have state budgets larger than the federal budget was thirty years ago.

    The "No, no, no regulations" of our union busting congress through the energy producers, insurance companies, credit card companies, pharmacutical manufacturers, all riding high on the grandest gravy train in history have all but destroyed what was once known as the working middle class American Citizens with legalized robbery by cash register.

    So if you want to call what I propose "union" I'll go for it because from what I see and experienced is almost total disunity within the social and political fabric of our nation.

    I appreciate your comments and will continue this discourse if you wish and expound on how a third party and winning by plurality can set this nation straight and back on its feet with the masses, not an oligarcic plutocracy, in power and control of government and politicians.

    TP
    Thomas_pearson46@hotmail.com

  • On Books   18 years 27 weeks ago

    It's probably no surprise to most that we are not safer... even totally aside from Homeland Security, US intelligence agencies predicted before the Iraq invasion that it would increase the threat of terror, and confirmed a few months ago that it had 'radicalized' previously passive Iraqis (which makes perfect sense; if you lived in Fallujah, or any other target of a major US offensive, I'd be pretty livid at the invaders).

    My own personal experience with the TSA was pretty disheartening. I walked into an airport for the first time since 9/11 a few months ago (two hours early, expecting all but a body cavity search). I was immediately faced with huge lines of people getting their tickets. I already had mine, but it occurred to me: if I was a terrorist and had walked in here with two suitcases full of explosives instead of clothes and books, I could have killed hundreds of people and probably shut the airport down for days quite easily. Is this security that makes people safer? Would it even be feasible to scan/search every person who walks into the airport (or subway station, bus stop, etc.)?

    What's totally off the agenda, are policy changes to make us safer. Are we pursuing a resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, long considered to be the major destabilizing force in the region, that respects the national, economic, etc. rights of both parties equally? Are we closing military bases in the Middle East? Are we ceasing support for brutal client regimes like Saudi Arabia and Egypt? Have we stopped interfering with national affairs of countries in the region? Of course not. These issues would probably go a long way towards stopping the root causes of jihadist terror- "drying up the sea in which the terrorists swim", as one analogy goes, but they are typically denounced as "appeasing terrorists" or some such nonsense. Instead of addressing these vital questions, we send Karen Hughes (whose title in more honest times would have been 'minister of propaganda') to little effect.

  • BLOODLESS REVOLT   18 years 27 weeks ago

    I like this train of thinking... mostly because it's oriented along class lines... what you're suggesting is what organized labor, or national popular organizations (or both), might work towards in a functioning democratic society. The US isn't, and changing that should be the primary goal of activists right now, IMHO.

  • I LAUGH IN THEIR rEPUBLICAN FACES ABOUT INCOME TAX   18 years 27 weeks ago

    Well, I don't listen to most of the talk shows and such... they're ridiculous, the discussion is akin to a couple of children arguing in my opinion... doesn't matter which political party it's from (or, to put it another way, whether it's "liberal" or "conservative" media), it's so far from anything resembling a sober, rational debate that it's not even worth listening to- except as comedy, maybe.

    In any case, yeah, if you ask people no one likes to pay taxes. But ask them the same question a different way, such as: do you want what you get for taxes? That is, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, police, fire departments, national defense, etc.? People have quite different answers.

    Naturally, the folks who are wealthy and privileged enough to send their kids to a private schools and elite universities and get wonderful health care because they make 6 or 7 figures, don't care a whit about these things. Those are the people who typically benefit most from tax cuts, not working people.

  • Welcome to the New PR Watch Forum!   18 years 27 weeks ago

    I'm using Win2000, Firefox 1.5 right now and have no problems with an overextended textbox.

    Judging by the date you guys posted, I'd say you were using a FF1.5 release candidate. Perhaps, if you go get the official release it will be fixed?