On Books

If I may I'd like to invite you to read my book, "OSAMA-His Loathing of Infidels," and add it to your reading list. I proved six months before Homeland Security finally admitted to the nation that "we were not safer." My terse book demonstrates step by step just how vulnerable our borders are and how our nation in all probability be struck by terrorists next. I had to write the book as a fiction novel because Dallas Texas is still there today, not destroyed...yet. Below you will find web addresses of at least 45 bookseller websites where my book is being sold nationally and internationally. http://www.bookfinder4you.com/IsbnSearch.aspx?isbn=1413734006&mode=direct If after reading my book and it scares you, send it to your congressional representatives. Perhaps it will wake them up. For if I, a former special operative, thought of what is depicted in the book, you can bet that the terrorist organizations already have too and are just waiting for the prime opportunity to strike. Sincerely, Thomas D. (Tom) Pearson thomas_pearson46@hotmail.com

Comments

Didn't read the book, but...

Submitted by ahapxnct on December 2, 2005 - 3:44am.

It's probably no surprise to most that we are not safer... even totally aside from Homeland Security, US intelligence agencies predicted before the Iraq invasion that it would increase the threat of terror, and confirmed a few months ago that it had 'radicalized' previously passive Iraqis (which makes perfect sense; if you lived in Fallujah, or any other target of a major US offensive, I'd be pretty livid at the invaders).

My own personal experience with the TSA was pretty disheartening. I walked into an airport for the first time since 9/11 a few months ago (two hours early, expecting all but a body cavity search). I was immediately faced with huge lines of people getting their tickets. I already had mine, but it occurred to me: if I was a terrorist and had walked in here with two suitcases full of explosives instead of clothes and books, I could have killed hundreds of people and probably shut the airport down for days quite easily. Is this security that makes people safer? Would it even be feasible to scan/search every person who walks into the airport (or subway station, bus stop, etc.)?

What's totally off the agenda, are policy changes to make us safer. Are we pursuing a resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, long considered to be the major destabilizing force in the region, that respects the national, economic, etc. rights of both parties equally? Are we closing military bases in the Middle East? Are we ceasing support for brutal client regimes like Saudi Arabia and Egypt? Have we stopped interfering with national affairs of countries in the region? Of course not. These issues would probably go a long way towards stopping the root causes of jihadist terror- "drying up the sea in which the terrorists swim", as one analogy goes, but they are typically denounced as "appeasing terrorists" or some such nonsense. Instead of addressing these vital questions, we send Karen Hughes (whose title in more honest times would have been 'minister of propaganda') to little effect.

Well get the book

Submitted by TomP46 on December 2, 2005 - 11:07am.

When I was in the military way back in the 60's I was a Navy SOG which in 1968 became the SEAL's and was a weapons specialist which in simple terms means that I was an American terrorist and assassin.

So I know quite a bit about how other terrorists would think out and plan out how to get into this nation and do it.

Right now since bush, cheney, and dumbsfeld are sending U S citizens "over there" there is no need for any terrorist group to spend a ton of money in plans and execution of plans causing transport half way round the world to do my dirty deeds.

In essense what bush, cheney, and dumbsfeld have done by keeping our folks there in Iraq is to furnish the terrorists our military and other U S citixens as a stay at home do it your self kit to be killed off cheaply in groups or individually, with little loss of their own terrorist folks.

The root cause of this terrorist-socalled insurgency war is the fact that it was U S and other western private sector corporations that raped the Arab nations of their minerals, and actually caused people like the Shah of Iran, the Iatola Kohmani, and Saddam Hussain to come into power.

Then to enhance it all it was U S and western nation's lousy foreign policies, and especially the U S's vascillating foreign policies of friend of Iran today enemy tomorrow, friend of Iraq and Saddam and furnish him arms and supplies to wage war against Iran and his own people, the hate Saddam and attack him when he wouldn't kiss ass.

If you ask me if bush just had to invade a country he should have invaded Saudi Arabia where 15 of the 19 terrorists of 911 were Saudi Citizens. The Saudi's have played bush, daddy bush, and the U S Government like fiddles.

Ask me again and I would say bush should have invaded Exxon, Mobil, Shell, and all the rest of the western corporations that raped the middle east and caused this whole damned mess starting 75 years ago.

Ask me a third time and I say bush should have invaded Impirical England and other European nations that held the middle east and Africa hostage to their empires for over 150 years.

But nah! The bush's daddy and sonny rather than disdaining Impirializm, instead emulate it, proudly..damn them to hell!

TP
thomas_pearson46@hotmail.com