This story may seem almost innocuous to many Americans. After all, it's just one environmental activist in far off Australia out of thousands worldwide supporting the development of nuclear power. But, it's a big deal down under and a boon for the Australian nuclear industry.
Mr. Flannery is a leading voice of environmental thinking in the South Pacific and around the world. His advocacy of nuclear power is a major coup for that industry and for Australia, which controls 24% of the world's exploitable uranium reserves. That is three times the reserves controlled by the USA!
I believe if Australia could sell it's citizens on a significant national commitment to developing nuclear power, they could probably be energy independent and a major seller nuclear fuel to the world within a decade.
The US government dislikes this idea, but it may have no power to prevent it.
There may be awful risks entailed in the nuclear power industry, as witness the continuing devastation and loss of life surrounding Chernoble. However, if I was an Australian, and considering what's at stake for the future of my country's economy, I wonder what I'd think? After all, the US government hasn't initiated any crash programs to de-commisson existing American reactors, or even to protect them from terrorists more effectively. If they are that safe for America, why shouldn't Australians pursue their natural advantage in Uranium ore?
PR Week reports on BP's communications response ("[http://www.prweek.com/us/news/article/577597/BP-ramps-comms-AK-crisis-threatens-image/ BP ramps up comms after AK crisis threatens image]," (sub req'd), August 11, 2006):
BP has more than doubled the number of external communications people working in its Anchorage, AK, crisis-response unit in light of its announcement August 7 that it would cease more than half its production in Prudhoe Bay - the largest oil field in the US - because of severe pipe corrosion and a "small" oil spill. ...
BP America president Bob Malone and Steve Marshall, president of BP Exploration Alaska, have done interviews on a number of national networks, including CNN, NBC, and PBS.
BP also took a pool of about 25 television and print journalists to the scene of the spill and pipelines this week. [BP press officer Neil] Chapman said contacting employees via e-mail and an internal intranet site is also a part of the communications process. ...
[W]hile [[Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide|Ogilvy]] is assisting BP during this situation, the company has elected to do the majority of work on its own.
The current state of typical media-political speech in the U.S. is frightening. There is little debate. Politics and ideas to which citizens are attached are closer to religious belief and faith than to positions arrived at through careful consideration in or of debate. What is worse, much of what passes for political speech (and media coverage thereof) bears close kinship to wartime propaganda, where sensationalistic claims, difficult to immediately debunk, are launched as ways to try to control public attention in order to push through or maintain political agendas. This is far more Orwellian than Jeffersonian. A recent analysis of all the factors converging in the present to promote this state of affairs calls the latter The Rumor Bomb: http://pearlsbee4swine.blogspot.com/2006/02/rumor-bomb-convergence-theory-of.html
And generally see pearlsbee4swine.blogspot.com
I find it depressing, that mature adults, living in a well educated modern society, are still intelectually in cabable of grasping how utterly childish and ignorant is this obsession over what other members of their society do with their genitals in the privacy of their homes. Really, cannot we all grow up here?
In your article, you state that the SBVFT attacks against Senator Kerry were "Smears." In light of revelations regarding Kerry lies about Cambodian excursions, CIA/covert operations and multiple Vietnam "tours," it would seem to me that you fit into the category of the Pot calling the kettle, Black! The absolute truth of the accusations against Kerry is that, for the most part, they REMAIN UNRESOLVED. Which is to say that neither side has been able to produce definitive evidence to support their position. Any claim to the contrary is patently dishonest.
The FACT is that the Navy Department declined to investigate the accusations against Senator Kerry. Opting, instead, to confine their comments to weather the paperwork for Kerry's decorations were in order. No other judgment, of any kind, was decided by the Navy's Inspector Generals Office.
When a group, such as yours, promotes itself as "The CENTER for media and Democracy," I think you should make an effort to be little more honest. At the very least, you should get your FACTS straight.
I took zyprexa which was ineffective for my condition and gave me diabetes.
Zyprexa, which is used for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, accounted for 32% of Eli Lilly's $14.6 billion revenue last year.
Zyprexa is the product name for Olanzapine,it is Lilly's top selling drug.It was approved by the FDA in 1996 ,an 'atypical' antipsychotic a newer class of drugs without the motor side effects of the older Thorazine.Zyprexa has been linked to causing diabetes and pancreatitis.
Did you know that Lilly made nearly $3 billion last year on diabetic meds, Actos,Humulin and Byetta?
Yes! They sell a drug that can cause diabetes and then turn a profit on the drugs that treat the condition that they may have caused in the first place!
I was prescribed Zyprexa from 1996 until 2000.
In early 2000 i was shocked to have an A1C test result of 13.9 (normal is 4-6) I have no history of diabetes in my family.
----
Daniel Haszard http://www.zyprexa-victims.com
The dreaded restless leg syndrome crisis. Yet other epidemic that is
going to bring down civilization. Marketing induced hypocondria!
The tragedy is how much attention from real social and planetary emergencies is diverted away by worry wart healthism. Hey, why not
use those restless legs to walk instead of using your car!
What good are peaceful, zen-like legs when it is 120 degrees out!
"If we cared more about CO2 than BMI, there would still be time."
Seems like Lieberman is being selfish. The people have spoken and
he refuses to accept that. Instead he is going to go ahead and
create further divisons.
Once again, George W. Bush uttered the "islamic fascist" expression. This time, it was all about a Heathrow plot uncovered at the most convenient time : Bush and Blair were said to have talked about this issue a couple of days earlier but didn't warn their partners, which means either they didn't care for them, or the emergency wasn't that critical. Anyway, Bush and Blair clearly needed a terror fix to go back up in the polls and to give some support to Olmert, also going down for his military failures. The message : war on terror is difficult but it has to be lead whatever the cost ; this is a noble cause, a moral one. Significantly, Jacques Chirac just used the term "immoral" to warn the US : not reaching a ceasefire agreement would be "immoral"... a clear echo to the messianic War on Terror propaganda.
This is not the first time Bush uses the "Islamic fascism" expression ; in a typically Karlrovish move, he's counterattacking with the very words that are being relevantly used against his Administration and now his protégés.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Stephane MOT -
http://e-blogules.blogspot.com
"[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0810/p04s01-woeu.html Nuclear power's green promise dulled by rising temps]," reports the Christian Science Monitor (August 10, 2006):
The extended heat wave in July aggravated drought conditions across much of Europe, lowering water levels in the lakes and rivers that many nuclear plants depend on to cool their reactors.
As a result, utility companies in France, Spain, and Germany were forced to take some plants offline and reduce operations at others. Across Western Europe, nuclear plants also had to secure exemptions from regulations in order to discharge overheated water into the environment. ...
"Global warming undermines the arguments we've always heard about nuclear power, that it doesn't damage the environment," says Stéphane Lhomme, spokesman for a French group, Sortir du Nucléaire, or Abandon Nuclear. "Nuclear is not saving us from climate change. It's in trouble because of climate change."
MSNBC just covered this story ("[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14233906/ A smoke screen at the ballot box?]," August 7, 2006). From a secretly-recorded exchange in Phoenix, Arizona:
Petition gatherer #1: Do you smoke?
NBC: No, I don't.
Petition gatherer #1: Oh, yeah. Well, this is The Non-Smoker Protection Act.
NBC: So, if I am a non-smoker, that's the one to do?
Petition gatherer #2: Yeah.
NBC: So this is a good one if you're a non-smoker?
Petition gatherer #3: Yeah, this is a good one because I have asthma, that's why I believe in this one.
NBC: This basically is a ban then on smoking?
Petition Gatherer #3: Yeah.
Well, that is just not true. If you really read the seven-page Arizona Non-Smoker Protection Act, you'll see it allows smoking almost anywhere liquor is sold.
I'm writing from Italy.I think that ,may be, it should be interesting for you to know that here in Europe(in Italy especially) nobody believe on Saddam's WMD possession.The general opinion is that Bush ( and Blair obviously) lied about the real reasons of war ,perhaps linked to reasons of domestic policy rather than international one.It's normal way for politicians to invent an artificial foe when the domestic policy has some difficulties to avert the public opnion on false target.After a long debate here also the right wing newspapers share this idea.Furthermore news coming from Lebanon got worse the opinion about the Bush's administration since it is considered as the main accomplice of present bloodshield.As forme I firmly hope that Israeli's government will follow the diplomatic way rather the war to solve the problem on its own interst. The real way for the USA to upgrade its cosideration in Arabic world is to engage himself on quick and total cease fire.I regret for my bad english but I hope that you would appreciate my intention. Ernesto Nocera
Everyone's got a Myspace account nowadays. If you want to advertize, you go to where the people are. It's not like they have a poll "click here to become a marine 4 life: yes X no 0"
All you bleeding heart liberals need to take a damn tour along with our Armed Forces brothers and sisters out there in the Middle East.
Personally, I'm sick of all the liberal views. CAIR can just as well kiss my you-know-what. These young men and women risk and sacrifice their lives to keep us here at home as safe as possible. Perhaps a little too safe, if you ask me.
The war dogs are becoming extinct...and are being fast replaced by flower-picking, everyone-can-get-along-if-we-respect-them daisies.
Man up and open your ******* eyes. Hate is hate...and it's gonna be around for a long damned while. I want to see what their reaction is gonna be the first time they're shot at while on tour. Are you gonna lay down your damned rifle and say "wait! we can solve this!"? Get real.
You can be liberal all you ******* want in the afterlife...cause that's where you're gonna be heading right quick and in a hurry.
Leave our boys alone, for crying out loud. Obviously, you f-ing liberals have way too much time and have life way too damned easy if you're gonna get your skirts in a bunch and your panties in a wad over a silly song.
Tanker, Dirk...I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your sacrifices and service. Semper Fi.
Sheldon, you have thus far been quite deft at your wordplay with Tanker...but what sacrifices have YOU made for your country? Please tell me that you have done more than author books.
Perhaps I am killing the messenger, but I am just SICK of hearing of how many liberals our boys have to deal with. In my honest opinion, they should round up all of them and send them on tour. I'm sure that they will have more to be concerned with/about than a song.
I think it is very sad that the ONLY thing CSPI can harp on is childhood obesity. There are many reasons the above practice is harmful, including turning them into little corporate clones. Furthermore, nutrition and exercise are important for all children.
It is too bad the corporate cops have no idea how much they are damaging children by constantly putting them in a negative spotlight
and contributing to the moral panic surrounding childhood obesity. I honestly think the corporations like it to, because they only have to defend themselves on one issue. They can just hope someone will invent a pill for fat and focus blame on parents until that comes along. I really feel sorry for today's childrens and thank God I am not a parent.
Of course not all PR people are untrustworthy, but I for one wish that the honest ones would speak out more assertively.
You talk about advocacy. If the PR industry as a whole were truly honest, the clients with harmful agendas would have a much harder time finding "advocacy" for hire. This advocacy isn't like that for criminal defendants, who are entitled by law to representation. There's no law that says anyone with an agenda is entitled to PR services.
"Don't confuse spin with advocacy."
Well, let's see:
I think of an advocate as someone who speaks out in the open for a particular person or cause. You know who he is and for whom and what he is speaking; you know his own stake in the matter if he has one.
But a spinner works in secret to manipulate what gets printed, broadcast and talked about. Often the agenda he's promoting has no obvious connection to the overt matter it's inserted into; the idea is just to plant thoughts or change attitudes without the targeted audience even noticing it. Usually the spinner would hate to have his role in the undertaking publically known, because that would shatter the illusion he seeks to create, and the whole thing wouldn't look so good to the people he's trying to influence. If truth and justice are ever well served under such conitions, it's more likely by chance than by design.
I would love to see high-profile industry groups like "PR Professionals Against Homelessness" or "PR Professionals Against Militarism." But I'm not holding my breath, for the simple reason that these hired "advocates" mostly go where the money is, just like anyone else with services to sell.
This or that firm may take on this or that pro bono project now and then, but, when you get down to it, there really isn't much money in promoting progressive political and social policies. It's the people with the money who would have to accept the limitations on their accumulations of power and wealth that progressive policies entail. As they say, money talks. But contrary to the saying, b.s. doesn't walk; it usually flies luxury class.
This, as I understand it, is the imbalance that CMD is working to rectify. If their work doesn't satisfy your own idea of "balance," you may have to resign yourself to looking elsewhere.
The issue is that it contains a worldview that not all PR practitioners follow, but paints them all with the same brush. The people in charge of this forum must think that PR folks are liars, not to be trusted, as opposed to advocates of their clients, which is what they're mandated to be. Not everyone follows this.
TBH, if you want to place PR folks in the same camp as this administration you'll have equal amounts that love that as hate it. The whole forum therefore has no real platform.
"If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective."
It's not just a matter of watching the PR groups, but of realizing what is being done to our civil society and our democracy with the active help of many of those groups.
One symptom of our society's profound dysfunction is the huge class of people who make a cushy living assuring the public that everything is hunky-dory when it really isn't. We're not talking church bake sale PR here. We're talking war and peace, slavery and freedom. Here's one person who appreciates CMD's work exactly as they're doing it.
If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective. Presenting a liberal viewpoint by reinforcing it with manipulating the public's perception of PR practitioners is pretty low.
This story may seem almost innocuous to many Americans. After all, it's just one environmental activist in far off Australia out of thousands worldwide supporting the development of nuclear power. But, it's a big deal down under and a boon for the Australian nuclear industry.
Mr. Flannery is a leading voice of environmental thinking in the South Pacific and around the world. His advocacy of nuclear power is a major coup for that industry and for Australia, which controls 24% of the world's exploitable uranium reserves. That is three times the reserves controlled by the USA!
I believe if Australia could sell it's citizens on a significant national commitment to developing nuclear power, they could probably be energy independent and a major seller nuclear fuel to the world within a decade.
The US government dislikes this idea, but it may have no power to prevent it.
There may be awful risks entailed in the nuclear power industry, as witness the continuing devastation and loss of life surrounding Chernoble. However, if I was an Australian, and considering what's at stake for the future of my country's economy, I wonder what I'd think? After all, the US government hasn't initiated any crash programs to de-commisson existing American reactors, or even to protect them from terrorists more effectively. If they are that safe for America, why shouldn't Australians pursue their natural advantage in Uranium ore?
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/printable_information_papers/inf75print.htm
Dick Jones, Director
Progressive Internet Action
212-787-0700 http://pia.net
http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/news/courant.aspx
PR Week reports on BP's communications response ("[http://www.prweek.com/us/news/article/577597/BP-ramps-comms-AK-crisis-threatens-image/ BP ramps up comms after AK crisis threatens image]," (sub req'd), August 11, 2006):
Looks like a marriage made in "conspicuous consumption" heaven.
By the way, do you think a Hummer driver or a Big-Mac-Attack diner consumes the most oil?
The current state of typical media-political speech in the U.S. is frightening. There is little debate. Politics and ideas to which citizens are attached are closer to religious belief and faith than to positions arrived at through careful consideration in or of debate. What is worse, much of what passes for political speech (and media coverage thereof) bears close kinship to wartime propaganda, where sensationalistic claims, difficult to immediately debunk, are launched as ways to try to control public attention in order to push through or maintain political agendas. This is far more Orwellian than Jeffersonian. A recent analysis of all the factors converging in the present to promote this state of affairs calls the latter The Rumor Bomb: http://pearlsbee4swine.blogspot.com/2006/02/rumor-bomb-convergence-theory-of.html
And generally see pearlsbee4swine.blogspot.com
I find it depressing, that mature adults, living in a well educated modern society, are still intelectually in cabable of grasping how utterly childish and ignorant is this obsession over what other members of their society do with their genitals in the privacy of their homes. Really, cannot we all grow up here?
In your article, you state that the SBVFT attacks against Senator Kerry were "Smears." In light of revelations regarding Kerry lies about Cambodian excursions, CIA/covert operations and multiple Vietnam "tours," it would seem to me that you fit into the category of the Pot calling the kettle, Black! The absolute truth of the accusations against Kerry is that, for the most part, they REMAIN UNRESOLVED. Which is to say that neither side has been able to produce definitive evidence to support their position. Any claim to the contrary is patently dishonest.
The FACT is that the Navy Department declined to investigate the accusations against Senator Kerry. Opting, instead, to confine their comments to weather the paperwork for Kerry's decorations were in order. No other judgment, of any kind, was decided by the Navy's Inspector Generals Office.
When a group, such as yours, promotes itself as "The CENTER for media and Democracy," I think you should make an effort to be little more honest. At the very least, you should get your FACTS straight.
I took zyprexa which was ineffective for my condition and gave me diabetes.
Zyprexa, which is used for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, accounted for 32% of Eli Lilly's $14.6 billion revenue last year.
Zyprexa is the product name for Olanzapine,it is Lilly's top selling drug.It was approved by the FDA in 1996 ,an 'atypical' antipsychotic a newer class of drugs without the motor side effects of the older Thorazine.Zyprexa has been linked to causing diabetes and pancreatitis.
Did you know that Lilly made nearly $3 billion last year on diabetic meds, Actos,Humulin and Byetta?
Yes! They sell a drug that can cause diabetes and then turn a profit on the drugs that treat the condition that they may have caused in the first place!
I was prescribed Zyprexa from 1996 until 2000.
In early 2000 i was shocked to have an A1C test result of 13.9 (normal is 4-6) I have no history of diabetes in my family.
----
Daniel Haszard http://www.zyprexa-victims.com
-tell the truth don't be afraid-
The dreaded restless leg syndrome crisis. Yet other epidemic that is
going to bring down civilization. Marketing induced hypocondria!
The tragedy is how much attention from real social and planetary emergencies is diverted away by worry wart healthism. Hey, why not
use those restless legs to walk instead of using your car!
What good are peaceful, zen-like legs when it is 120 degrees out!
"If we cared more about CO2 than BMI, there would still be time."
Seems like Lieberman is being selfish. The people have spoken and
he refuses to accept that. Instead he is going to go ahead and
create further divisons.
Once again, George W. Bush uttered the "islamic fascist" expression. This time, it was all about a Heathrow plot uncovered at the most convenient time : Bush and Blair were said to have talked about this issue a couple of days earlier but didn't warn their partners, which means either they didn't care for them, or the emergency wasn't that critical. Anyway, Bush and Blair clearly needed a terror fix to go back up in the polls and to give some support to Olmert, also going down for his military failures. The message : war on terror is difficult but it has to be lead whatever the cost ; this is a noble cause, a moral one. Significantly, Jacques Chirac just used the term "immoral" to warn the US : not reaching a ceasefire agreement would be "immoral"... a clear echo to the messianic War on Terror propaganda.
This is not the first time Bush uses the "Islamic fascism" expression ; in a typically Karlrovish move, he's counterattacking with the very words that are being relevantly used against his Administration and now his protégés.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Stephane MOT -
http://e-blogules.blogspot.com
______________________________________________________________________________________
"[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0810/p04s01-woeu.html Nuclear power's green promise dulled by rising temps]," reports the Christian Science Monitor (August 10, 2006):
MSNBC just covered this story ("[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14233906/ A smoke screen at the ballot box?]," August 7, 2006). From a secretly-recorded exchange in Phoenix, Arizona:
I'm writing from Italy.I think that ,may be, it should be interesting for you to know that here in Europe(in Italy especially) nobody believe on Saddam's WMD possession.The general opinion is that Bush ( and Blair obviously) lied about the real reasons of war ,perhaps linked to reasons of domestic policy rather than international one.It's normal way for politicians to invent an artificial foe when the domestic policy has some difficulties to avert the public opnion on false target.After a long debate here also the right wing newspapers share this idea.Furthermore news coming from Lebanon got worse the opinion about the Bush's administration since it is considered as the main accomplice of present bloodshield.As forme I firmly hope that Israeli's government will follow the diplomatic way rather the war to solve the problem on its own interst. The real way for the USA to upgrade its cosideration in Arabic world is to engage himself on quick and total cease fire.I regret for my bad english but I hope that you would appreciate my intention. Ernesto Nocera
Everyone's got a Myspace account nowadays. If you want to advertize, you go to where the people are. It's not like they have a poll "click here to become a marine 4 life: yes X no 0"
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50323
It's a parody.
There is no issue of copyright infringement.
Other criticisms aside, this video’s (mis)use of the Linux “Tux the Penguin” mascot falls somewhere between rudeness and open copyright infringement.
I even made a video (without corporate support) saying so: “Al Gore’s Penguin Army” Video Misuses Linux Mascot.
All you bleeding heart liberals need to take a damn tour along with our Armed Forces brothers and sisters out there in the Middle East.
Personally, I'm sick of all the liberal views. CAIR can just as well kiss my you-know-what. These young men and women risk and sacrifice their lives to keep us here at home as safe as possible. Perhaps a little too safe, if you ask me.
The war dogs are becoming extinct...and are being fast replaced by flower-picking, everyone-can-get-along-if-we-respect-them daisies.
Man up and open your ******* eyes. Hate is hate...and it's gonna be around for a long damned while. I want to see what their reaction is gonna be the first time they're shot at while on tour. Are you gonna lay down your damned rifle and say "wait! we can solve this!"? Get real.
You can be liberal all you ******* want in the afterlife...cause that's where you're gonna be heading right quick and in a hurry.
Leave our boys alone, for crying out loud. Obviously, you f-ing liberals have way too much time and have life way too damned easy if you're gonna get your skirts in a bunch and your panties in a wad over a silly song.
Tanker, Dirk...I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your sacrifices and service. Semper Fi.
Sheldon, you have thus far been quite deft at your wordplay with Tanker...but what sacrifices have YOU made for your country? Please tell me that you have done more than author books.
Perhaps I am killing the messenger, but I am just SICK of hearing of how many liberals our boys have to deal with. In my honest opinion, they should round up all of them and send them on tour. I'm sure that they will have more to be concerned with/about than a song.
I think it is very sad that the ONLY thing CSPI can harp on is childhood obesity. There are many reasons the above practice is harmful, including turning them into little corporate clones. Furthermore, nutrition and exercise are important for all children.
It is too bad the corporate cops have no idea how much they are damaging children by constantly putting them in a negative spotlight
and contributing to the moral panic surrounding childhood obesity. I honestly think the corporations like it to, because they only have to defend themselves on one issue. They can just hope someone will invent a pill for fat and focus blame on parents until that comes along. I really feel sorry for today's childrens and thank God I am not a parent.
Of course not all PR people are untrustworthy, but I for one wish that the honest ones would speak out more assertively.
You talk about advocacy. If the PR industry as a whole were truly honest, the clients with harmful agendas would have a much harder time finding "advocacy" for hire. This advocacy isn't like that for criminal defendants, who are entitled by law to representation. There's no law that says anyone with an agenda is entitled to PR services.
"Don't confuse spin with advocacy."
Well, let's see:
I think of an advocate as someone who speaks out in the open for a particular person or cause. You know who he is and for whom and what he is speaking; you know his own stake in the matter if he has one.
But a spinner works in secret to manipulate what gets printed, broadcast and talked about. Often the agenda he's promoting has no obvious connection to the overt matter it's inserted into; the idea is just to plant thoughts or change attitudes without the targeted audience even noticing it. Usually the spinner would hate to have his role in the undertaking publically known, because that would shatter the illusion he seeks to create, and the whole thing wouldn't look so good to the people he's trying to influence. If truth and justice are ever well served under such conitions, it's more likely by chance than by design.
I would love to see high-profile industry groups like "PR Professionals Against Homelessness" or "PR Professionals Against Militarism." But I'm not holding my breath, for the simple reason that these hired "advocates" mostly go where the money is, just like anyone else with services to sell.
This or that firm may take on this or that pro bono project now and then, but, when you get down to it, there really isn't much money in promoting progressive political and social policies. It's the people with the money who would have to accept the limitations on their accumulations of power and wealth that progressive policies entail. As they say, money talks. But contrary to the saying, b.s. doesn't walk; it usually flies luxury class.
This, as I understand it, is the imbalance that CMD is working to rectify. If their work doesn't satisfy your own idea of "balance," you may have to resign yourself to looking elsewhere.
The issue is that it contains a worldview that not all PR practitioners follow, but paints them all with the same brush. The people in charge of this forum must think that PR folks are liars, not to be trusted, as opposed to advocates of their clients, which is what they're mandated to be. Not everyone follows this.
TBH, if you want to place PR folks in the same camp as this administration you'll have equal amounts that love that as hate it. The whole forum therefore has no real platform.
Don't confuse spin with advocacy...
"If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective."
It's not just a matter of watching the PR groups, but of realizing what is being done to our civil society and our democracy with the active help of many of those groups.
One symptom of our society's profound dysfunction is the huge class of people who make a cushy living assuring the public that everything is hunky-dory when it really isn't. We're not talking church bake sale PR here. We're talking war and peace, slavery and freedom. Here's one person who appreciates CMD's work exactly as they're doing it.
If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective. Presenting a liberal viewpoint by reinforcing it with manipulating the public's perception of PR practitioners is pretty low.
Don't confuse spin with advocacy...
Doctors have the right to prescribe for off-label purposes, and
the evidence suggests that Dr. Gleason was *accurately* describing
the benefits of Xyprem in his speeches.
http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/mcb/165_001/papers/manuscripts/_536.html
I am concerned at the suppression of freedom of speech, and
freedom of medical choice this prosecution represents.
Xyprem is GHB, a widely used substance which is a natural metabolite
in the body, not a toxic drug. GHB which was used for its
pleasant relaxing qualities and several health benefits, was banned
in the US in the 90's, for reasons that did not seem scientifically
well-supported.