Quid Pro Glow: UK Government Funds Nuclear Lobbying

by Diane Farsetta — March 6, 2006 - 12:10pm
Share/Save Share this

Graphic from the Nuclear Energy InstituteIn Britain, "public money has been used to support a vigorous pro-nuclear campaign." The campaign, Nuklear21, includes "workers from the defunct Chapelcross nuclear plant in Dumfries and Galloway," who have been handing out leaflets at "Scottish party political conferences." The leaflets call nuclear power "atoms for peace" and claim that "nuclear will help save the planet." Nuklear21 has mailed every Member of Scottish Parliament and "is planning a mass lobby of the Westminster parliament." The government-owned company British Nuclear Group admits to paying "travel and business expenses" for Nuklear21 since 1995. It's also provided "'administrative support facilities' such as offices and communication systems." WWF Scotland's director called it "clearly outrageous" that "taxpayers' money has been secretly funding the nuclear industry to lobby for new reactors." Prime Minister Tony Blair launched a national energy review in January, which is splitting members of "the Liberal Democrat Party, the Labour Party and the government's green advisers."

Main Source: 
The Sunday Herald (Scotland), March 5, 2006

Comments

UK commission rejects nuclear 'solution'

Submitted by Diane Farsetta on March 7, 2006 - 10:44am.

Reuters reports that one of Britain's "leading government advisory group[s]" [http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/35495/story.htm is strongly disagreeing] "with all those people advising the government that nuclear is necessary":

The Sustainable Development Commission, the government's watchdog on sustainable development issues, came down in favour of more renewable energy sources and greater energy efficiency rather than replacing old nuclear plants with new ones. ... "There is little point in denying that nuclear power has its benefits but, in our view, these are outweighed by serious disadvantages," [Commission chair Jonathon] Porritt said. He said the nuclear industry had not solved the problem of waste that remains highly toxic for millennia and was very secretive about its costs. Nuclear would risk proliferation and drain money from alternative power and distribution systems.