Taking a Stand for Religious Freedom and Against Intolerance

Share/Save Share this

Religious Freedom"All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good men [and women] to do nothing," wrote Sergei Bondarchuk. In order to stand up to the escalating animosity directed against Muslim Americans, and in light of the upcoming anniversary of 9/11, I helped create this pledge to support religious freedom and stand in solidarity against bigotry and intolerance. I hope people of all faiths, and people of conscience who do not practice a religion, will speak out against the planned burning of the Koran this Saturday, as with the burning of any sacred books or other books. Surely, good men and women in this country vastly outnumber hate mongerer Terry Jones and his little band of religious bigots in Gainesville and elsewhere.

Any ancient text -- including the Old Testament, the New Testament, the Koran, the Upanishads, The Republic, City of God, to name just a few -- has sentences that can be taken out of context by extremists in attempts to rationalize behavior that most modern followers or readers would reject as inconsistent and unacceptable in this day and age. In the days after September 11, 2001, people of all faiths -- Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, and others, along with agnostics and atheists -- condemned those who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as murderers whose acts were not acceptable to any moral person. But the recent wave of intolerance and hatred across the country, symbolized by the burning of books, has unfairly maligned innocent practitioners of Islam. I believe we must stand against such acts, and the spin and propaganda they represent, before they take root. So three of us, who have long worked to strengthen national security and protect civil liberties, sat down and drafted it -- civil liberties lawyer Kate Martin, former national security official Suzanne Spaulding, and me. We wrote it because we do not believe that the voices of intolerance are an accurate reflection of America, and we worry that such intolerance puts wind in the sails of terrorists' propaganda. We hope Americans will respond to this call to stand up for religious freedom and against intolerance, and demonstrate that this nation remains committed to these fundamental founding values.

The pledge, pasted in its entirety below, simply asks people of good will to add their voices.

We are proud to live in the United States , a country founded on constitutional principles of tolerance and religious freedom.
We affirm America 's commitment to these principles.
We condemn bigotry and intolerance by any and all, especially those who murder others in the false name of their religion.
We condemn the act of burning the Koran, a sacred text for millions of Americans and others around the world, as we would condemn the burning of all sacred texts.
We pledge to remember Americans and others from around the world, including Muslims, Christians, Jews, and people of other faiths, who were murdered on September 11, 2001, American service men and women of all faiths who have lost their lives in the wars since then, and innocent civilians, of all faiths, who have died in those wars, and to honor their sacrifice by reaffirming our commitment to the principles of tolerance and religious freedom.
Please join us in lighting a candle in solidarity on the eve of September 11th and that night. Share the link to our petition on your website, Facebook page, or Twitter, and forward it to appropriate lists of potential signers: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/632/action/Tolerance

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'll grant you that Jones is

I'll grant you that Jones is probably a bigot but there are thousands of bigots that we all casually ignore or respond with jokes. Take Phelps as an example - you don't get the President or Sec State commenting on his brand of hate but suddenly someone burns a book or a bunch of fundamentalist zealots threaten violence in retaliation and suddenly it's all gone too far!

I'm sorry but the claim that you're just dealing with bigotry doesn't ring true.

I think that if a group threatens violence if anyone doesn't meet their religious demands are met then we need people to stand up to them. Shame on you for condemning this action merely because it's being done by a bigot and an idiot. Freedom of speech & religion is only necessary when we disagree with it!

Whaaa?

Burning books no matter how "sacred" is in no way comparable to killing people or committing terrorism.

Terry Jones is a bigot and an idiot but I wholeheartedly support him ripping, burning, folding or even reading whatever books he legally purchased. It's no more our business what he does with his property than it's our business what two gay men do in the privacy of their homes.

It's just a book and it's hardly unique. It will offend people but so what, one of the great parts of free speech and freedom of religion is that people (especially religious people) get offended.

Best response: stop treating this like it's equivalent to burning people and stop giving in to the Muslim's threats of violence - it's political blackmail and we're better than that.

Dear Tyro

Thank you for writing in. I am not suggesting that Jones be charged with any crime for book-burning; I agree that people can lawfully burn books they own. But, I disagree that the antidote to such small-minded bigotry is just silence. I think that it's appropriate to exercise free speech rights to condemn such bigotry. And, I never said burning a book is the same as killing a person; they are plainly different acts, morally and legally. I also disagree with the assertion that this is about giving into threatened violence or blackmail. If other small-minded jerks decided to burn Bibles or other holy books, I'm sure there would be violent reactions in some quarters of those faiths because to people of faith their books are thought to be the word of God and sacred. I think that it is not just right but essential for people of conscience to speak out against such intolerance and bigotry, even when the proponent attempts to wrap his warped mind and actions in the Bible or other religious claims. Lisa

And, I never said burning a

And, I never said burning a book is the same as killing a person; they are plainly different acts, morally and legally

That's the clear impression you leave by saying that you condemn burning the Quaran and then immediately talking about 9/11 and the sacrifices of soldiers.

I think that it is not just right but essential for people of conscience to speak out against such intolerance and bigotry, even when the proponent attempts to wrap his warped mind and actions in the Bible or other religious claims.

Let's be clear. Which is the problem here: the burning of a book or the violent retribution some fanatics use to silence critics?

I think the answer is obvious, the violence is the problem. When I read pieces like yours (and this is very common) I'd never imagine that a violent riot or assassinations would be anything other than a reasonable response.

You're giving the classic "she wore a short skirt" rape defence.

more

Seriously, Tyro, the rape "defence"? Absurd and actually offensive to me.
We mention 9/11 because the event was scheduled to take place that day and because the day should be a day of remembrance of those who lost their lives that day and since then. After the attacks people from all faiths and no faiths came together to condemn those murderous attacks. That unity was splintered in part by right-wing efforts to portray the fight not as one against al Qaeda but against Islam, efforts that were ultimately disavowed by the Pentagon and numerous national security and civil liberties advocates. This is not about "silencing critics"; it's about speaking out against religious hatred and intolerance, using speech to challenge speech in the marketplace of ideas, which is certainly part of our American tradition.
I'm sorry you want to spend so much time quibbling, and I'm sorry Mr. Jones' stunt has consumed so much attention when there are so many important challenges we face domestically and abroad. But, I stand by my call to speak out against bigotry and for religious tolerance for all faiths, not just Mr. Jones' version of the truth. Lisa

Seriously, Tyro, the rape

Seriously, Tyro, the rape "defence"? Absurd and actually offensive to me.

Oh really?

In both cases you have an innocent person exercising their rights and in response they're threatened with violence with the claim that the men/zealots can't control themselves in the face of such provocation.

In both cases, people leap out to say "she should have known better" or "he was egging them on". In both cases the response should be to condemn the violence, yet instead you ignore the threats and the real violence and instead condemn the innocent victim.

it's about speaking out against religious hatred and intolerance

And what displays less tolerance: killing infidels, killing those who offend your religious beliefs (like Theo VanGogh), or a symbolic book burning?

Nice to see where your priorities lie.

Time that you stood up for genuine liberties against those who would take it through actual violence. (And no, I don't think burning books will accomplish anything but stabbing a few cartoonists and movie makers has sure worked wonders - it's got you firmly on their side!)

Bravo

Bravo for your post. There is so much hate in this world and such acts of burning religious books just adds to that hate.

Thank you, Charissa!

I really appreciate your note and hope you have signed the pledge!! Lisa