Whole Foods Market Caves to Monsanto

Share/Save Share this

WholeFoodsMarketAfter 12 years of battling to stop Monsanto's genetically-engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation's organic farmland, the biggest retailers of "natural" and "organic" foods in the U.S., including Whole Foods Market (WFM), Organic Valley and Stonyfield Farm, have agreed to stop opposing mass commercialization of GE crops, like Monsanto's controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa. In exchange for dropping their opposition, WFM has asked for "compensation" to be paid to organic farmers for "any losses related to the contamination of his crop." Under current laws, Genetically-Modified Organisms (GMOs) are not subject to any pre-market safety testing or labeling. WFM is abandoning its fight with biotech companies in part because two thirds of the products they sell are not certified organic anyway, but are really conventional, chemical-intensive and foods that may contain GMOs and that they market as "natural" despite this. Most consumers don't know the difference between "natural" and "certified organic" products. "Natural" products can come from crops and animals fed nutrients containing GMOs. "Certified Organic" products are GMO-free. WFM and their main distributor, United Natural Foods, maximize profits by selling products labeled "natural" at premium organic prices.  (A typographical error in the second sentence of this story was subsequently corrected.  We regret this minor error.)

Comments

oh really?

just look up. it doesn't happen every day, but it does happen.

really?

I thought GMO seeds were designed to grow only one season. So... if they've cross contaminated, wouldn't the damage be temporary?

Absolutely not. It would

Absolutely not. It would lead to the decertification of a farm as organic, which would then be a 5-10 year process to undo. It also means that any seeds that the farmer was planning to save are useless, since courts have ruled them the property of Monsanto post-contamination, requiring a purchase of seeds for the next year and a destruction of the fields and crops that are there already.

In the case of alfalfa, it means that farmers lose their animal and soil feed crop and their organic certification in one fell swoop.

GE Cross-Pollination

Hi,

For the non-botanists in the room - the bulk of the calories that we consume are seeds - wheat, corn, soybeans, you name the grain - all are seeds. Seeds are produced when the pollen from the flower of a plant travels on the wind to the flower of another plant, where the pollen fertilizes the flower by mixing genetic material - the same principle as human sex that has resulted in the magnificent variety of life forms on this planet. When GM pollen fertilizes the flower of a non-GM plant, the seeds that are produced are essentially half GMO, and carry some of those traits. A few years ago Monsanto launched a new type of seed imbued with a gene they called the Terminator, which made it impossible for the plants that grew from those seeds to produce viable seeds themselves. Because of the extreme danger of introducing the Terminator gene into the food supply, where (through cross-pollination) it could easily sterilize many of the world's food crops, the Terminator gene was abandoned. However, Monsanto has achieved a similar outcome through patent law - farmers who buy the seed must sign a contract stating that they will not attempt to save seed (save some of the year's crop for planting the following year, as farmers have been doing for thousands of years). If they do, or if a non-GM farmer's crop is pollinated by GM pollen, they can be sued for theft of intellectual property (despite the fact that the law does not account for the laws of physics or botany).
Sadly GMOs have made their way into every facet of American life - from the health food store to batteries to the gloss on magazines - and beyond, to the world, to India, where farmers commit suicide en masse because they can't afford the fancy chemicals Monsanto salesmen are pushing down their throats. It is an ugly mess, and the only way out is to demand proper labeling of GM foods, to avoid them like the plague, and to spread the word to your friends. Your dollar is your vote.

It seems you're a

It seems you're a hypocrite.

For all Monsanto's patent trolling, it's not the technology itself to blame, it's a misuse. As for India, I highly doubt its land can feed its population without GMO. So "organics" and anti-GMO fear is not a solution, fair law and open knowledge is. To fight Monsanto by opposing GMO itself is like fighting Microsoft by opposing computers. Luddism are not only useless, it in fact helps to hide the real cause.

Feeding India with GMOs

Actually, there are studies available that belie the Monsanto PR that touts the high yields of GM crops (ie the ability to feed a hungry world). The two promises -- the GM crops will produce higher yield and reduce pesticide use -- have not been demonstrated in 13 years since they were introduced.

I have blogged extensively about this. The latest is here, if you would like to see some of these studies. http://www.wellwise.org/blogs/james-townsend/gmo-blog-do-we-need-genetically-modified-crops

Also, Robyn O'Brien, a food analyst, mother of four and founder of Allery Kids Foundation, has a wonderfully concise and revealing TED video about this here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rixyrCNVVGA

It's not the technology

It's not the technology itself to blame, or even the misuse per se -- it's the corporation that misuses it that's to blame! And Monsanto has never given the slightest indication that it will ever quit misusing the technology to make serfs of farmers as long as it's allowed to. You don't have to be a Luddite to recognize that.

If you "highly doubt" that India can feed itself without GMOs, maybe it's because that's the line that Monsanto and others have be grinding out relentlessly for years and years.

The only problem with non-GMO foods, as Monsanto sees it, is that if farmers can keep on using seeds next year that they saved from this year, as they have since the origins of agriculture thousands of years ago, Monsanto can't make any money off them, and the gazillions they've "invested" in developing Frankenfoods will be lost. It's that simple.

And yes, I think opposing GMO foods is an excellent way to oppose Monsanto. We might not be able to do without computers, but we can do just fine with natural foods, thank you very much!

No - GMO crosspollination is part of The Plan

Hello,

Cross-pollination occurs after the crops are grown. It doesn't have anything to do with the seeds. And typically, the farmer could keep seed from the GMO crop, but he is forbidden to do so by contract. He must buy new GMO seed each year. The GMO company (like Monsanto) runs periodic inspections of the farms to verify that the farmer is not keeping back crop seed.

Cross-pollination means that the farmer whose field is contaminated is now in violation of the GMO company's contract and must pay the GMO company compensation for the "use of" the GMO crop. This has been established in court.

mp

Cross-pollination occurs after the crops are grown?

Cross-pollination happens while the plants are in bloom. In this context, it's where the pollen of a GMO crop is carried by wind or insect into a field of non-GMO crop is being grown and the pollen fertilizes the flower producing an eventual seed that has the genetic markers of both crops. The farmers most affected by this are not even buying their seed from Monsanto; they are using seed that they have saved from year-to-year as most farmers did at one time. When the genetic markers of Monsanto's seeds tests in the saved seed of the non-GMO farmer, Monsanto sues them for using their seed genetics without their permission.

Watch Food Inc. to get a better and more in-depth look at this subject.

Sue Monsanto

Too bad a bunch of farmers couldn't come together and sue Monsanto for littering on their property (as well as damaging/poisoning their crops). Unfortunately, they'd probably lose.