Whole Foods Market Caves to Monsanto

Share/Save Share this

WholeFoodsMarketAfter 12 years of battling to stop Monsanto's genetically-engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation's organic farmland, the biggest retailers of "natural" and "organic" foods in the U.S., including Whole Foods Market (WFM), Organic Valley and Stonyfield Farm, have agreed to stop opposing mass commercialization of GE crops, like Monsanto's controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa. In exchange for dropping their opposition, WFM has asked for "compensation" to be paid to organic farmers for "any losses related to the contamination of his crop." Under current laws, Genetically-Modified Organisms (GMOs) are not subject to any pre-market safety testing or labeling. WFM is abandoning its fight with biotech companies in part because two thirds of the products they sell are not certified organic anyway, but are really conventional, chemical-intensive and foods that may contain GMOs and that they market as "natural" despite this. Most consumers don't know the difference between "natural" and "certified organic" products. "Natural" products can come from crops and animals fed nutrients containing GMOs. "Certified Organic" products are GMO-free. WFM and their main distributor, United Natural Foods, maximize profits by selling products labeled "natural" at premium organic prices.  (A typographical error in the second sentence of this story was subsequently corrected.  We regret this minor error.)

Comments

Sad, very sad....Monosato are

Sad, very sad....Monosato are bullies

Whole Foods Market Caves to Monsanto

Forget GMO's. They should be called what they are WMD's.

Whole Foods makes deals with Devils

Why does a company, which potentially does EXTREME harm to people and the environment, have to AGREE to sanctions? Are they not subject to the law, just like everyone else? Why does a company like Whole Foods, which we THINK to be socially responsible, make deals with such companies? I think I know why: it's because WFs is a COMPANY. And more than that, contrary to the image too many people hold dear, it's a CORPORATE company, whose ONLY REAL interest is in MAXIMIZING PROFITS.

That they have defended farmer's rights and the principals of pure and organic foods is just PR aimed at building a certain clientelle, NOT because any of those values were ever really heartfelt. CORPORATIONS DON'T HAVE HEARTS!

The best, and really the ONLY way to influence a corporation to promote, protect and defend HUMAN values, is with our wallets and our feet. Knowing what I know now, I will play Whole Foods off against Von's and Ralphs and the other SoCal grocers that I MUST patronize, just to eat.

If we don't like what a company is doing, we MUST deny them our business, and even better, make a sign and stand out front of their stores and encourage others to do the same thing.

This deal with Monsanto is OBSCENE. ASKING Monsanto to compensate farmers for contaminating their crops won't work. Their whole strategy is to OWN EVERYBODY'S crops! I think that EVERY FARMER must SUE them to remove their artificial genes, or else pay MILLIONS per case. Their methods are egregious, and evil.

F-

F-

Organic Valley and Stonyfield Farm didn't cave in

http://www.facebook.com/notes/organic-valley/were-still-doing-what-weve-always-done-which-doesnt-include-surrendering-to-mons/178612515507950

and

http://www.stonyfield.com/blog/2011/01/29/the-organic-community-must-come-out-swinging-at-the-right-opponents/

Disgusting.

Disgusting.

I guess they can't call it

I guess they can't call it "Whole Foods' anymore.

This makes for a great

This makes for a great sadness! We will have to continue the fight without them. That is all I can say. I love Stoneyfield too. I think they are the only true organic dairy out there.

Spin from the Organic Consumers Association

This article is taken without a single fact being checked from a blog by Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association. Immediately after the USDA decision, he focused the blame solely upon these three businesses. Organic Valley and Stonyfield get all their milk from the CROPP cooperatives, the oldest organic coop in the US. They have very high organic standards, and high standards for humane treatment and Organic Valley products get very high marks from the Cornucopia Institute for their products. There are around 1600 small organic farmers who stand to lose big if this kind of irresponsible journalism continues. They never had any intention to stop fighting, in fact Organic Valley spent 6 years doing just that, with a large financial support of the Center for Food Safety. This article doesn't come close to the truth. Losing organic farmers and organic producers at this point in time is a CRAZY plan, which only plays into MONSANTO's hands!
I don't even shop at a Whole Foods, but know that they had all their in-store products tested by the NON-GMO Project. See independent article here: http://www.naturalfoodlist.com/4243/on-getting-divided-and-conquered-how-biotech-firms-are-winning-the-war-via-social-media/
http://www.naturalnews.com/027495_Whole_Foods_GMOs.html

If anyone is interested, please check these links for an alternative perspective. I hate to see organic acreage lost at this point in the battle:
http://www.nongmoproject.org/2011/01/29/team-organic-will-never-surrender-to-monsanto-now-we-continue-the-fight-together/
http://fairfoodfight.com/2011/02/01/cummins-vs-whole-foods-organic-smacktalk/
http://berlinnaturalbakery.com/blog/index.php/2011/02/02/gmo-wars-united-we-stand-divided-we-fail/
These are the minutes of the USDA meeting the supposed sell outs attended: http://berlinnaturalbakery.com/blog/index.php/2011/02/02/gmo-wars-united-we-stand-divided-we-fail/
And this letter lays out what these folks were asked to comment on, the "coexistence" that was spun to mean selling out (consider, again, that gmo corn, soy, and canola are already coexisting in REALITY with non-GMO varieties, albeit not well at all, and I'm FOR a total ban, but this was the ONLY discussion allowed at this point)
http://agriculture.house.gov/press/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1293

on the contrary

The suggestion that the article us without facts or is irresponsible is baseless. Anne looked into this matter. Cornucopia, which you cite, also expressed concerns about the decisions of Whole Foods, et al.

You concede far too much. The idea that coexistence was the "only discussion allowed at this point" fails to understand the very point, which is why the corporations would accept that limitation? Had they rallied their vast customer base to reject this artifical limitation of options and demand that Monsanto/USDA not be allowed to dictate such a limited conversation surely you could imagine another result.