Pinkwashing Turns on Itself with Breast Cancer Awareness Gun

Share/Save Share this

Smith & Wesson Breast Cancer Awareness PistolOctober was Breast Cancer Awareness month, and the group Breast Cancer Action seized on the opportunity to promote its Think Before you Pink campaign to raise awareness of how companies are increasingly exploiting breast cancer as a marketing device to sell products -- some of which are actually harmful to women's health. Pink ribbon campaigns are offering up some bizarre, albeit benign products like a breast cancer awareness toaster and a breast cancer awareness floating Beer Pong table. But the most bizarre item yet to have a pink ribbon slapped on it must be Smith & Wesson's Pink Breast Cancer Awareness 9 mm Pistol, promoted by a woman named Julie Goloski, Smith and Wesson's Consumer Program Manager and a sharpshooter herself. Goloski is promoting S&W's breast cancer awareness pistol on her Facebook page, saying "October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month and Breast Cancer Awareness M&P’s are shipping to dealers. I am thrilled to have my name associated with such a worthy cause and one of my favorite firearms." According to a 2008 report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, firearms are the second most common cause of violent deaths of women, accounting for 29.2% of all violent deaths among females in the U.S. in 2008.

Comments

Good Grief, Anne!

I have rarely seen such a complete example of someone who refuses to let her opinion be swayed by facts, or so eager to engage in ad hominem attacks. Ms. Landeman, I encourage you to actually read and consider perspectives other than your own.

"firearms are the second

"firearms are the second most common cause of violent deaths of women"

How are Firearms the CAUSE of death??? Wouldn't homicide be the cause of death? The gun didn't cause her death, the person behind the trigger did! People can get bludgeoned to death with a pink toaster, or stabbed in the eye with a pink pen or toothbrush just as much as they could get shot with a pink gun.

The company is giving money to breast cancer research. Shouldn't you celebrate that? Would you rather they didn't give their profits to charities and kept it instead? The author of this articles ignorance astounds me.

Anne, you stated "I

Anne, you stated

"I challenge the appropriateness of "pinking" a product so closely associated with being used to purposefully wound and kill, and leveraging it supposedly to fight a disease that also wounds and kills."

Any cure for cancer would involve "killing" bad cells. In same same way as a woman would wield a pistol to kill a rapist or a murderer that would victimize her, doctor's would sight in on malignant cells and destroy them.

By your logic, because something living is killed in the process of purging disease, a cure for cancer is, as you put it, bizarre.

Rapists, murderers, and other predators that aim in on women are the life-sized versions of the cancerous cells that prey on an unfortunate number of females. You support a cure for cancer, something which only exists in theory and that we're desperately on the hunt for. However, we've had a publicly available cure to protect women from evil men for hundreds of years... Why are you so for one, but wish to victimize more and more women by taking the other out of their hands?

Bad comparison

A single human being who acts maliciously cannot be compared to a cancer cell, unless they reproduce uncontrollably, with each new person wielding a gun in a similarly malicious manner.

Anne Landman

pink nukes

how about pink thermonuclear warheads from westinghouse? after all, nuclear bombs have killed on average fewer than 3000/year over the last half century, they saved the lives of thousands of GIs in WWII, and they kept the peace for decades through M.A.D. (although the jury is still out on whether The Bomb will get us all yet).

remember: handheld nuclear weapons don't kill people, people kill people. but a nuke makes it really easy.

But is Westinghouse promoting them as ...

...pink "breast cancer awareness" nuclear warheads? If so, send me the link and I'll do a Spin on them, too.

Anne Landman

Quotes for thought from the "far right wing"

The Dalai Lama said acts of violence should be remembered, and then forgiveness should be extended to the perpetrators. "But if someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, he said, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun."

[Likewise if cancer is trying to kill you one could also resist.}

"God made man and God made woman, but Samuel Colt made them equal." ~Unknown Author

Thomas Jefferson In his Commonplace Book, Jefferson quotes Cesare Beccaria from his seminal work, On Crimes and Punishment: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

[Mass shootings occur in "weapon free" zones.]

"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." ~Mahatma Gandhi, "An Autobiography OR The story of my experiments with truth", by M.K. Gandhi, p.238

"To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them." ~George Mason

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” ~George Washington

The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil. And while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.
-Jeff Cooper

Peace.

Infantilism?

Whether it is the press focusing on the sensationalism or a politician the result seems the same--infantilism. Can use of guns lead to death--yes. Can use of cars lead to death--yes. Can use of vioxx lead to death--yes. But violence. . . Hey have you had a car aggresively pointed at you in a threatening manner? I have at least dozen times--as a pedestrian, a bicyclist, and as a motorist. Motor vehicles kill many more than guns, Cars pose a huge risk to me on my bicycle on a daily basis. If I am at the range I feel much safer than on a bike--because I am!!

Is the press reporting on the risk of cars to pedestrians and cyclists--not really. Are the dummycrats and the idiotcans calling for car control? Nope. In fact motorists can brandish an automobile in a crosswalk daily (not to defend their life but to expediently remove you as an impediment to their progress) and the cops do nothing, Motorists run people over and get away most of the time with no charges--unless they were drunk.

So for people like anne L where is the car ban proposal?

Cars (and local zoning ordinances) cause serious global warming which is in the process of indirectly and directly killing many many people and vast parts of the planet. Yet the party of gun control--the democrats--really dont give a damn. They are too busy subsidizing surplus car sales to the tune of 20k of taxpayer money per car so that certain people in the auto industry can pick up a few more shifts!

The democrats also did the stupidist political thing in the 20thc with the so called assault weapons ban. That misadventure in political thinking destroyed any possibility for health care "reform" for many years due to their wipeout in 1994. If the tale was told properly the democrats allowed many more women to die from cancer due to poor health care than were saved by the :"assault ban:"

There is no refuting that observation; assault ban=democrats loss of congress=no health care access progress.

Too bad third parties have no chance in america because anne l and the rest of the dummycrats need a lesson as bad as the power hungry idiotcans needed with the terry schiavo shenanigans.

Bottom line is I am a younger voter under 50 that cant be defined in any one set of cool aid policies of either party.

Namaste (but packing) [not a contradiction]

Breast awareness is always a

Breast awareness is always a good thing.

I really don't understand

I really don't understand why women should NOT own firearms. I've shot with quite a few over the years; neither sex nor gender are a hindrance to putting rounds on target.

Sad to say but it seems more women then men are targets of rape. I can think of no better treatment for rapists than high velocity lead therapy. Used correctly, there's a zero chance of recidivism.