
"It is ironic in the extreme that an administration that's so interested in letting industry come up with its own solutions would come down with a heavy government hand on a company that's being creative," said one public health expert, commenting on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's decision [4] not to allow Kansas' Creekstone Farms to test every cow it processes for mad cow disease. Creekstone wants 100% testing in order to resume sales to Japan, South Korea and other countries banning U.S. beef; the inability to export "is costing [Creekstone] $40,000 a day and forced it to lay off 50 employees." Industry associations, including the American Meat Institute and National Cattlemen's Beef Association [5], applauded the USDA, saying 100% testing is "not based on sound science [6]."
Links:
[1] http://dev.prwatch.org/users/6/diane-farsetta
[2] http://dev.prwatch.org/topics/environment/agriculture/mad-cow-disease
[3] http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.prwatch.org%2Fspin%2F2004%2F04%2F2541%2Fus-department-apprehension&linkname=U.S.%20Department%20of%20Apprehension
[4] http://www.usda.gov/Newsroom/0141.04.html
[5] http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=National_Cattlemen%92s_Beef_Association
[6] http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Sound_science
[7] http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/10/national/nationalspecial2/10COW.html