The spam filter installed on this site is currently unavailable. Per site policy, we are unable to accept new submissions until that problem is resolved. Please try resubmitting the form in a couple of minutes.
Submitted by waterflaws in Denver (not verified) on December 18, 2010 - 11:35am.
The $205 million the United States* would allocate for Israeli weapons, is a relatively inconsequential amount; not a "shower" in and of itself. I think your other points are poignant and valid, but THIS small sum doesn't justify them.
Intransigence goes both ways in Palestine-Israel. I am anti-zionist, but I think the only way for either faction to survive would be unfettered integration. The population has/will grow; the people have to live somewhere!
*read: "Israel Lobby and Crazy Christians, with a few Capitalists thrown in
general observations
The $205 million the United States* would allocate for Israeli weapons, is a relatively inconsequential amount; not a "shower" in and of itself. I think your other points are poignant and valid, but THIS small sum doesn't justify them.
Intransigence goes both ways in Palestine-Israel. I am anti-zionist, but I think the only way for either faction to survive would be unfettered integration. The population has/will grow; the people have to live somewhere!
*read: "Israel Lobby and Crazy Christians, with a few Capitalists thrown in