The spam filter installed on this site is currently unavailable. Per site policy, we are unable to accept new submissions until that problem is resolved. Please try resubmitting the form in a couple of minutes.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on July 12, 2009 - 7:52pm.
Since when is expanding, rethinking, or innovating "a thing" a crime? I applaud Mr. Potter for making the move he did. I have, what I believe to be, excellent medical coverage - ironically through CIGNA. But that doesn't mean I don't think it could be better. Much better. Don't you think it's the job of good government, big or small, to at least investigate to needs of those who do not have medical care? Imagine if we only "covered" part of country with defense? "Sorry Florida, or Alaksa, or Texas it's just too complicated to provide your part of the country with military defense. Too expensive. Covering you would make government too big. Give it too much power."
Too big for what? Too complicated for who? Our priorities are jacked up. Take for instance the recent government bailout of GM. Do you think if a company like GM could have off-loaded health care costs they would have needed a bailout? Apply this to any company and the benefits from a Wall Street perspective would out weigh the costs.
More Thinkers Needed
Since when is expanding, rethinking, or innovating "a thing" a crime? I applaud Mr. Potter for making the move he did. I have, what I believe to be, excellent medical coverage - ironically through CIGNA. But that doesn't mean I don't think it could be better. Much better. Don't you think it's the job of good government, big or small, to at least investigate to needs of those who do not have medical care? Imagine if we only "covered" part of country with defense? "Sorry Florida, or Alaksa, or Texas it's just too complicated to provide your part of the country with military defense. Too expensive. Covering you would make government too big. Give it too much power."
Too big for what? Too complicated for who? Our priorities are jacked up. Take for instance the recent government bailout of GM. Do you think if a company like GM could have off-loaded health care costs they would have needed a bailout? Apply this to any company and the benefits from a Wall Street perspective would out weigh the costs.
Go Wendell Go!!!!