Today's popular content
- Resources for Investigating ALEC/NRA Gun Bills (25,437)
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food" (21,199)
- Marco Rubio, Geo Group, and a Legacy of Corruption (17,094)
- Blessed Unrest for a Wiser Earth: John Stauber Interviews Paul Hawken (14,285)
- The Health Care Industry vs. Health Reform (14,095)
- How Far Have We Really Come from the "One-Drop Rule"? (8,687)
- This Is Going to Hurt: What Your Doctor Doesn't Say Can Cost You (8,685)
- Backgrounder: the History of the NRA/ALEC Gun Agenda (8,313)
- A Side of Climate Change Denial with Your Coffee? ALEC Dishes up Some Hard to Swallow Spin with the Heartland Institute (7,065)
- About ALEC Exposed (6,900)
Readers' Comments
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: pbarnrob
-
Submitted by: EarlBowden
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
Submitted by: AndrewG
Just wondering if the mining
Just wondering if the mining company is paying the same back taxes (times the years in the program), fee's, etc for the 3600 acres if removed from the Managed Forest land as the rest of us would have to do. If they are getting a legislative break...so should the rest of us.