The spam filter installed on this site is currently unavailable. Per site policy, we are unable to accept new submissions until that problem is resolved. Please try resubmitting the form in a couple of minutes.
Submitted by Karl Haro von Mogel (not verified) on May 21, 2013 - 11:18am.
Jill Richardson is trying to have it both ways here. She is trying to blame Monsanto and by extension, other biotech companies, for problems with Omega-6 and Omega-3 balances. As far as I know, they don't have an interest in making people eat more Omega-6 fatty acids. That's a really bizarre interpretation. It is the only recourse when a company she dislikes comes up with something useful, and doesn't want to credit them for it. It's all part of a maniacal scheme, you see! (FYI, I do not work for industry.)
Jill calls eating omega-3 soybeans a "band aid fix" yet paradoxically recommends eating hemp seed. This is trying to have it both ways. How is getting Omega-3's from GE soybeans a "band aid fix" yet getting them from hemp seeds not a "band aid fix?" This is bad logic at its worst.
Having it both ways
Jill Richardson is trying to have it both ways here. She is trying to blame Monsanto and by extension, other biotech companies, for problems with Omega-6 and Omega-3 balances. As far as I know, they don't have an interest in making people eat more Omega-6 fatty acids. That's a really bizarre interpretation. It is the only recourse when a company she dislikes comes up with something useful, and doesn't want to credit them for it. It's all part of a maniacal scheme, you see! (FYI, I do not work for industry.)
Jill calls eating omega-3 soybeans a "band aid fix" yet paradoxically recommends eating hemp seed. This is trying to have it both ways. How is getting Omega-3's from GE soybeans a "band aid fix" yet getting them from hemp seeds not a "band aid fix?" This is bad logic at its worst.