The spam filter installed on this site is currently unavailable. Per site policy, we are unable to accept new submissions until that problem is resolved. Please try resubmitting the form in a couple of minutes.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 9, 2011 - 1:17pm.
More information that seems less emotional and reactionary:
http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/tfer.html
From YOUR link:
Dioxins. The EPA, in 1999, had originally proposed a TEQ limit of 300 parts per trillion (ppt or pg/g) in biosolids applied to land,
which is well above the means of 32 or 48 ppt detected in recent biosolids surveys.
Subsequent to the 1999 proposal, the EPA made a final decision
not to regulate dioxins in land-applied biosolids. After five years of study, which included outside peer review, the Agency determined that dioxins from this source do not pose a significant risk to human health or the environment *******
more reality checking...
More information that seems less emotional and reactionary:
http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/tfer.html
From YOUR link:
Dioxins. The EPA, in 1999, had originally proposed a TEQ limit of 300 parts per trillion (ppt or pg/g) in biosolids applied to land,
which is well above the means of 32 or 48 ppt detected in recent biosolids surveys.
Subsequent to the 1999 proposal, the EPA made a final decision
not to regulate dioxins in land-applied biosolids. After five years of study, which included outside peer review, the Agency determined that dioxins from this source do not pose a significant risk to human health or the environment *******